h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
h4831sc Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
Your session is about to timeout as a result of inactivity. Simply click Okay to increase your time and efforts for an extra 0 minutes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was developing extra strain and was slower compared to old things. I do not keep in mind if I even tried using standard h4831 or not; I'm wondering not. Click on to expand...
It's probably that no even further discussion is needed, wherein case we advise starting off a completely new thread. If nevertheless you really feel your reaction is required you are able to nevertheless do this.
Caution employing SC or SSC developed loads with long Minimize, again off and perform up. Use Harmless loading strategies.
Anyway, I knew The 2 lbs . of H4831SC used exactly the same data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was anything different in between a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and 1 not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon confirmed which they had been in reality identical and the only difference was The brand to the label.
Considering that there won't seem like any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can a number of you give a starting point with this combination and issues to think about when working this Load up?
I am working with it that has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't h4831 vs h4831sc as correct. RL22 did perfectly but I was somewhat worried about temp stability. I believe I'm at seventy two grains and have about 2850ish fps
Im under the knowledge I need to use h4831sc. I have examine that these powders are identical Aside from the shorter grain size on the sc. Should really I even now be looking out for h4381sc?
WA I'd personally endorse a slower burner that should give improved scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you are loading heavies lengthy.
[email shielded] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I've killed extra Deer using this combo than the many rifles I personal blended, Function approximately this but the sweet place are going to be about 54, I'm a Two Little bit-06 nut and I've some things tat functions very well for me In the event your fascinated
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They're exactly the same/identical powder cept for grain dimension. Load data is interchangeable.
Like Every person claimed, the SC stands for “quick Slice” and is a little bit simpler to meter. Will make you h4831sc load data issue why they'd continue to make the normal one particular.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my three hundred WM but experienced far better speed and precision with H1000. I would instead utilize a slower burning powder with 215g drugs.
I found that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with reduced to min rates. I’m speaking 2700 (maybe 2800) fps, it had been a low 60s grain cost in a Norma scenario. Not what I had been seeking, h4831 vs h4831sc but accurate Nevertheless.